Zuti secer
Moderatori: mr ph. Silvio, moderato, admin, vlada99
-
- Aktivan član
- Postovi: 185
- Pridružio se: Pet Avg 03, 2007 1:16 pm
- Koliki je zbir brojeva cetiri i pet: 5
- Lokacija: Novi Sad
Zuti secer
Koji je secer najzdraviji?Primetila sam u prodavnicama zdrave hrane smedji od secerne trske!Do sada sam koristila zuti,ali sam cula da je taj od secerne trske zdraviji.
-
- Novi član
- Postovi: 26
- Pridružio se: Pet Maj 18, 2007 11:23 pm
- Koliki je zbir brojeva cetiri i pet: 5
- Lokacija: srbija
- Kontakt:
Pa ja koristim zuti, smedji je takodje zdraviji nego beli ali je presladak i njega koristim kada pravim torte i kolace
Zuti mi je uz kafu odlican posto pijem slatku kafu.Pre sam posle svake kafe imala muku sa zeludcom a od kada koristim zuti secer i mleko u prahu kafa mi ne smeta,cak mogu pijem sto kafa na dan 


Merillin evo nesto za tebe:
THE FACTS
Leif Parson
We all know that brown rice is better for you than white rice, and whole wheat bread comes out on top over white bread, but does this pattern extend to sugar as well?
It is often said that brown sugar is a healthier option than white sugar. But you can chalk that up to clever marketing or plain and simple illusion. In reality, brown sugar is most often ordinary table sugar that is turned brown by the reintroduction of molasses. Normally, molasses is separated and removed when sugar is created from sugarcane plants.
In some cases, brown sugar — particularly when it is referred to as “raw sugar” — is merely sugar that has not been fully refined. But more often than not, manufacturers prefer to reintroduce molasses to fine white sugar — creating a mixture with about 5 percent to 10 percent molasses — because it allows them to better control the color and size of the crystals in the final product.
So the two varieties of sugar are similar nutritionally. According to the United States Department of Agriculture, brown sugar contains about 17 kilocalories per teaspoon, compared with 16 kilocalories per teaspoon for white sugar.
Because of its molasses content, brown sugar does contain certain minerals, most notably calcium, potassium, iron and magnesium (white sugar contains none of these). But since these minerals are present in only minuscule amounts, there is no real health benefit to using brown sugar. The real differences between the two are taste and the effects on baked goods.
THE BOTTOM LINE
Nutritionally, brown sugar and white sugar are not much different.
THE FACTS
Leif Parson
We all know that brown rice is better for you than white rice, and whole wheat bread comes out on top over white bread, but does this pattern extend to sugar as well?
It is often said that brown sugar is a healthier option than white sugar. But you can chalk that up to clever marketing or plain and simple illusion. In reality, brown sugar is most often ordinary table sugar that is turned brown by the reintroduction of molasses. Normally, molasses is separated and removed when sugar is created from sugarcane plants.
In some cases, brown sugar — particularly when it is referred to as “raw sugar” — is merely sugar that has not been fully refined. But more often than not, manufacturers prefer to reintroduce molasses to fine white sugar — creating a mixture with about 5 percent to 10 percent molasses — because it allows them to better control the color and size of the crystals in the final product.
So the two varieties of sugar are similar nutritionally. According to the United States Department of Agriculture, brown sugar contains about 17 kilocalories per teaspoon, compared with 16 kilocalories per teaspoon for white sugar.
Because of its molasses content, brown sugar does contain certain minerals, most notably calcium, potassium, iron and magnesium (white sugar contains none of these). But since these minerals are present in only minuscule amounts, there is no real health benefit to using brown sugar. The real differences between the two are taste and the effects on baked goods.
THE BOTTOM LINE
Nutritionally, brown sugar and white sugar are not much different.
Evo jos nesto Merillin:
Is brown sugar more nutritious than white? by Kellie Collins The facts
Brown bread is more nutritious than white bread - true
Brown rice is more nutritious than white rice - true.
Brown sugar is more nutritious than white sugar - false.
Yes indeed, I'm sorry to break it to you all but you can no longer sprinkle brown sugar on your cereal or stir it into your tea thinking that you are getting some added benefit compared to using white sugar.
Related Links
Advertorial Starvation diets Take your diet on holiday (and still have fun!) What are the 'pros' of probiotics? Don't be disillusioned just because the brown version of things like bread, pasta and rice are better for you. That's because those foods are unrefined and contain more vitamins, minerals and fibre than the white version.
When it comes to sugar however, there is no nutritional difference between white and brown - brown sugar is simply white sugar coated in molasses. Sugar consists entirely of carbohydrate - mainly sucrose, and 100 grams provides about 395 calories.
Sugar can be thought of as 'empty calories' as it does not provide any vitamins or minerals - only calories, which is why it is bad news for those of us watching our weight.
So keep your diet sweet and light and ditch that sugar bowl - be it brown or white, because at the end of the day, sugar is sugar and it's all going to end up in the one place - which will more than likely be on your hips.
Is brown sugar more nutritious than white? by Kellie Collins The facts
Brown bread is more nutritious than white bread - true
Brown rice is more nutritious than white rice - true.
Brown sugar is more nutritious than white sugar - false.
Yes indeed, I'm sorry to break it to you all but you can no longer sprinkle brown sugar on your cereal or stir it into your tea thinking that you are getting some added benefit compared to using white sugar.
Related Links
Advertorial Starvation diets Take your diet on holiday (and still have fun!) What are the 'pros' of probiotics? Don't be disillusioned just because the brown version of things like bread, pasta and rice are better for you. That's because those foods are unrefined and contain more vitamins, minerals and fibre than the white version.
When it comes to sugar however, there is no nutritional difference between white and brown - brown sugar is simply white sugar coated in molasses. Sugar consists entirely of carbohydrate - mainly sucrose, and 100 grams provides about 395 calories.
Sugar can be thought of as 'empty calories' as it does not provide any vitamins or minerals - only calories, which is why it is bad news for those of us watching our weight.
So keep your diet sweet and light and ditch that sugar bowl - be it brown or white, because at the end of the day, sugar is sugar and it's all going to end up in the one place - which will more than likely be on your hips.
-
- Aktivan član
- Postovi: 576
- Pridružio se: Ned Sep 23, 2007 12:20 am
- Koliki je zbir brojeva cetiri i pet: 5
- Lokacija: Beograd, Srbija
Hm, iznenadjenje.
Svugde vlada misljenje da je zuti secer "zdraviji" od belog. Kao npr. sto je crni hleb zdraviji od belog, isto i secer nije toliko preradjen kao beli...
Ali svakako u malim kolicinama, ne previse... ne moze garantovano da skodi, barem tako vlada generalni stav strucnjaka... ja to nisam izmislio.
Svugde vlada misljenje da je zuti secer "zdraviji" od belog. Kao npr. sto je crni hleb zdraviji od belog, isto i secer nije toliko preradjen kao beli...
Ali svakako u malim kolicinama, ne previse... ne moze garantovano da skodi, barem tako vlada generalni stav strucnjaka... ja to nisam izmislio.